Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Wearing clothes according to companies’ policy is considered better by some organizations although others may value performance more highly. Both these opposite views will be described here in my essay along with a mention of my own personal opinion towards the idea.
To dress well is considered essential in many business fields as the workers appearance may directly reflect the companies’ values or, in any circumstances, workers are needed to interact with customers. It is ubiquitous that uniforms are specially designed by the request to exert an effect that employees symbolize work ethics or particular goals. Flight attendants must use the established clothes with certain color and sometimes motto embedded revealing their organization jargon. Bank officers, on the other hand, are the right example why dress smartly is important. If they freely wear whatever clothes they want, people may lose their trust because professional looks commonly defined as part of satisfying services.
However, now many regards excellent performance and work ethic as far more important aspects on job rather than formal or suitable looks. Work quality is demanded to ensure the companies run well, so in this term a lack of incentive may be paid on fashion. Google never impose certain dressing policy for its people as it is believed that freedom given will resulted in more flexible and creative work atmosphere, encouraging workers to be professional without any justification on what they wear. I think this a better working practice to apply as professional looks may just show a fabricated image.
All in all, despite of the contrasting views concerning how people should be looked at in the companies, I believe fashion style at work has no relevancy with work output. I hope more employers will take into account the benefits of free-clothing rules at worksites.
No comments:
Post a Comment