IELTS Writing Task 2 | appearance

Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.

Wearing clothes according to companies’ policy is considered better by some organizations although others may value performance more highly. Both these opposite views will be described here in my essay along with a mention of my own personal opinion towards the idea.

To dress well is considered essential in many business fields as the workers appearance may directly reflect the companies’ values or, in any circumstances, workers are needed to interact with customers. It is ubiquitous that uniforms are specially designed by the request to exert an effect that employees symbolize work ethics or particular goals. Flight attendants must use the established clothes with certain color and sometimes motto embedded revealing their organization jargon. Bank officers, on the other hand, are the right example why dress smartly is important. If they freely wear whatever clothes they want, people may lose their trust because professional looks commonly defined as part of satisfying services.

However, now many regards excellent performance and work ethic as far more important aspects on job rather than formal or suitable looks. Work quality is demanded to ensure the companies run well, so in this term a lack of incentive may be paid on fashion. Google never impose certain dressing policy for its people as it is believed that freedom given will resulted in more flexible and creative work atmosphere, encouraging workers to be professional without any justification on what they wear. I think this a better working practice to apply as professional looks may just show a fabricated image.

All in all, despite of the contrasting views concerning how people should be looked at in the companies, I believe fashion style at work has no relevancy with work output. I hope more employers will take into account the benefits of free-clothing rules at worksites.

IELTS Writing Task 1 | University Graduates In Canada

The line chart regards to comparison rate of Canada university graduates in men and women from 1992 to 2007.

The presented line chart compares the number of Canadian university graduates in terms of their gender between 1992 to 2007. Generally, despite of the strikingly similar trend between both figures which was an upward one, there were always much more females than males’ alumni over the time.

1992 to 2000 experienced a very slight movement in the total of graduates whether they were women or men. The former stood at just below 100,000 and then minimally increased before going back to its 1992’s level. The same was true for the later, but it started low at 70,000.

There was a very dramatic rise given by female from to 2000 to 2006 as it consistently rocketed and peaked at almost 150,000 in the end of period. For the opposite gender, males, it was a more moderate trend for inclining by more or less 20,000 to end up at 95,000, 40,000 lower than female graduates.